Zcash Founders Reward:
Plenty of controversy in the last two weeks around the Zcash (ZEC) Founders Reward (FR).
The FR is hard-coded into the ZEC protocol, providing the ZEC team 2.1m ZEC, or 10% of total supply, over the first four years of the network’s life cycle.
The FR saga started after Arjun Balaji published a piece discussing the ‘founder incentive trilemma’, which refers to the difficulty of satisfying the following three properties: a) decentralized governance & development b) continuous team/founder incentive alignment c) fairness.
Things then became slightly messy after INBlockchain’s Eric Meltzer proposed that the FR be modified, with a certain % being directed into an ecosystem fund. A ZCash Co. employee, Daira, proceeded to shut down the thread, claiming that the proposal was an act of violence due to its insinuations of effectively stealing from ZCash employees.
The thread was later re-opened following approval from ZEC founder, Zooko Wilcox, who, despite not agreeing with the proposal, suggested that the discussion was a worthy one.
I have given this topic a lot of thought and still cannot come to a definitive conclusion as to whether I think the FR should be modified.
There is a strong argument that the FR should remain untouched: it was transparent from the conception stage of the network and it seems right that the founders should be rewarded for the value they have created.
At the same time, I think that there is value in the network community having a say in the network’s monetary policy: after all, ZEC is ostensibly a decentralized community, which should bring with it a governance process where multiple parties (investors, users, developers) have a say.
Augur, the much anticipated decentralized prediction market, has finally launched on the Ethereum mainnet.
Augur was initially conceived in 2015 and was one of the first projects to pursue an ICO.
The mainnet launch was met with a mixed response.
Enthusiasts were excited by the release of by far the most technically complicated decentralized application (dApp) to date and continue to proclaim the many use cases ( decentralized derivatives, leverage of wisdom of crowds) that the platform will provide. So far over $320,000 has been staked across a variety of markets, with the largest market being the $150,000 staked on whether Ethereum will exceed $500 by the end of 2018 (right now Augur predicts 70% yes!).
Critics, including myself, were disappointed by the dApps User Interface and User Experience, in particular the rather complicated order book interface and the lack of a native web app – in order to use Augur you have to download it and sync with an Ethereum node.
For a project that took 3 years to ship to mainnet and is currently valued at over $330m, one might expect less user friction! Ari Lewis of Grasshopper Capital wrote very well on what he expects from a good dApp, while Nathaniel Whittemore writes more generally about how we have moved into the Age of Execution Maximalism – well worth the read.
You can check out all the Augur markets here.
Consensus Protocols/The ‘Stack’:
Plenty of progress on the analysis of various consensus protocols and the Web3 stack over the last couple of weeks.
The team at Mechanism Labs published this invaluable document comparing consensus protocols (Tendermint, Thunderlla, Algorand, Casper FFG, Dfinity etc.) and this fantastic short-read on the various elements of the blockchain stack. Essential reading!
Multicoin Capital’s Kyle Samani published his own breakdown of the Web3 Stack, although William Mougayar, a prominent blockchain evangelist, was critical of his depiction, suggesting that his version was more accurate. The Enterprise Ethereum Alliance has their own understanding of the Web3 stack, which can be found here.
Mohammed ElSeidy, Partner at zkCapital, published an explainer on the new family of consensus protocols previewed by Professor Emin Gün Sirer.
Big news from Coinbase, which announced that they are exploring the addition of 6 new assets to their platform – Cardano, 0x, Stellar, Brave Attention Token, and Zcash.
As explained in their blog post, the announcement was made internally at Coinbase and to the public at the same time, largely in order to avoid the kind of insider trading activity that many presume occurred when Coinbase listed Bitcoin Cash in December.
The post also notes that these assets will require additional exploratory work and that the exchange cannot guarantee they will be listed for trading. Nevertheless, each asset spiked somewhere between 10-30% on the announcement, with speculators presuming that increased liquidity and the Coinbase stamp of approval will drive prices up over the short-medium term.
It must be noted that Coinbase will only be accepting deposits of transparent Zcash (ZEC) – ZEC that has not used the protocol’s shielded transaction feature. Most industry analysts agree that transparent transactions far exceed shielded transaction volume.
Coinbase’s refusal to definitively confirm the listings brought some ridicule from their peers — Kraken, another popular exchange, announced that they were likewise considering various additions, linking their audience to coinmarketcap, a site listing over 1,600 assets.
A quick update on EOS.
1. Accusations from some Ethereum community members that a member of the EOS/Block.One community is purposefully spamming the Ethereum network with redundant transactions in order to increase gas fees to unsustainable levels. I’m not entirely sure to what extent I believe the accusation, but it is nevertheless an interesting theory.
2. Block.One (B1), the company behind the development of EOS, has announced that they have closed a strategic investment round led by Peter Thiel and Bitmain. Other notable investors include Brevan Howard’s Alan Howard.
I was generally under the impression that the $4bn raised in the year-long ICO would be enough to sustain the project for the foreseeable future but what do I know about anything? Clearly nothing!
3. The EOS constitution has come under heavy criticism from all sides of the EOS community after the director of the EOS Core Arbitration Forum (ECAF) ordered Block Producers (BP) to suspend several accounts.
Since then, Dan Larimer, the CTO of B1, has advocated that the entire constitution be scrapped in favour of a new-and-improved version. Fortunately for those who derive great pleasure from watching EOS collapse in real time, the improved constitution is equally flawed. You can find a critical response from an EOS BP here.
4. Throughout the ICO process, B1 had assured investors and users that they would step away from EOS post-launch in order to avoid welding undue influence in the governance process.
Of course, this act of stepping away was presumably also at the advice of B1’s lawyers, who knew that B1’s active involvement in EOS would likely add further weight to the argument that $EOS should fall under the unregistered securities category.
Nevertheless, just weeks after the launch it has been revealed that B1, which holds 10% of all $EOS tokens, will be participating in the EOS BP voting process. The announcement, which starts with a self-congratulation for the swift and successful launch of the platform, notes that B1 will participate as an “active minority voting member.”
Bitcoin (BTC) has found some bullish momentum this week, rising from a local low of $6,070 up to the $6,600-$6,700 range. For those interested in Technical Analysis, the 1D Bollinger Bands are now very tight, suggesting a strong move (in either direction) in the near future.
I reported on the ‘Bitcoin Days Destroyed (BDD)’ metric in the last issue of CryptoChat. In this tweet, @MrJozza suggests that the BDD downtrend indicates that large investors are currently unfazed by the market downturn.
Meanwhile, Professor Eric Budish of UChicago has published a paper on the Economic Limits of Bitcoin and the Blockchain, which (as far as I can tell — have not read it fully yet!) suggests that BTC will be subject to attacks if it becomes sufficiently economically important. At a $114bn market cap, I personally feel that BTC is currently sufficiently economically important, but I am not a tenured professor at UChicago’s School of Business.
Finally, take a look at a comparison table of Bitcoin’s predecessors.
Ether (ETH) has similarly built some momentum over the course of the week, recovering from a local low of $417 before rising up to the $470-$480 range.
The ETH/BTC ratio has also seen a short-term recovery, appreciating to 0.071 after a low of 0.067 on the 10th July.
Some interesting crypto-asset related resources below:
Kitty Sales gives live updates on the sale of CryptoKitties.
DoIOwnAShitcoin — speaks for itself.
TokenAnalyst — providing data on Token Transfer Count across a variety of networks.
SifrData — a phenomenal site all round but their volatility index is especially captivating right now.
Correlation — an incredibly comprehensive overview of the correlation of crypto-assets: 75% of the top 200 coins currently have a correlation of 0.67 or higher.
The FBI has 130 crypto-asset-related investigations open.
It is unclear as to whether this includes their investigation into Russian intelligence agent’s use of Bitcoin to pay for services during the election meddling process.
The Maltese government has passed three bills relating to crypto assets, blockchain, and distributed ledger technology, making it one of the first jurisdictions in the world to pass specific legislation around this burgeoning technology.
The Korean Blockchain Association has announced that they found all exchanges under review met at least the minimum requirements of the self-imposed regulations.
The reviewed exchanges included Bithumb, Huobi Korea, and UPbit.
On-chain Vote Buying:
A fascinating piece from several members of Cornell’s Initiative for Cryptocurrencies & Contracts (IC3) on vote-buying and Dark DAO’s, decentralized cartels that buy on-chain votes opaquely.
A comprehensive survey from ING on crypto-asset ownership across various jurisdictions.
According to the survey results, 9% of Europeans own some crypto assets, compared to 8% in the U.S. This far exceeds my expectations: be weary of the limited sample size.
Eric Meltzer, INBlockchain: “If the cheapest anyone got involved with your project is at a $200m valuation, then you simply cannot have a community similar to that of Bitcoin, where there is a mass of HODLers who got in at a very low price and are almost completely unperturbed by subsequent price volatility.”
After what felt like centuries of uncertainty, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a statement declaring that the Ethereum network has reached a level of decentralization such that its native digital asset, Ether (ETH), should not be regulated as a security.
Several interesting developments on the EOS front this week as the smart-contract platform attempts to move towards a mainnet launch.
All eyes on EOS this week as the firm behind the software production, Block.
Leading crypto asset exchange Coinbase acquired Paradex, a 0x relayer, this week.
Brian Venturo, CTO of Atlantic Crypto, published an analysis of the economics of Casper FFG, Ethereum’s hybrid Proof of Work/Proof of Stake consensus mechanism.